Site icon Civitas Maxima

Week in Review: Week 9

Week in Review: Week 9

Introduction to Week 9’s hearings and witnesses

The ninth week of the Gibril Massaquoi trial ended on 7 April 2021, after three days of hearings in Monrovia, Liberia. Hearings focused on the testimony of eight witnesses. As with prior witnesses, their identities were concealed.

The witnesses were heard in the following order and are described as follows:

Trial Monitoring Day 25 (5 April 2021)

Trial Monitoring Day 26 (6 April 2021)

Trial Monitoring Day 27 (7 April 2021)

Monrovia Testimony 

Events in Monrovia

Massaquoi in Monrovia

Torture in Klay

Lofa County Testimony

Killing of civilians

Identifying Remarks and Roles

Interactions with Finnish Police

Emerging themes for Prosecution and Defense

The first two Defense witnesses this week, Witness 48 and Witness 49, provided testimony regarding the death of Johnny Paul Koroma, building on testimony heard from several witnesses in Week 8 of the trial. The questions  relating to Koroma’s death appeared to be an attempt to grasp a firmer understanding of the timing of Massaquoi’s whereabouts in Liberia, and specifically Lofa County. Witness 48 believed that the RUF was responsible for Johnny Paul Koroma’s death, and stated that Angel Gabriel gave the order to arrest Koroma, though the Witness was not present at the time of the order. Witness 49 also indicated that Angel Gabriel gave the order to arrest Koroma. Following the arrest, Witness 49 heard gunshots, which led him to believe Koroma had been killed, though he admitted that he never saw the body. Both Witness 49 and Witness 48 indicated that Johnny Paul Koroma was killed in 2001, and Witness 49 believed that, after Koroma was killed, Angel Gabriel and some others were transferred to Bomi Hills. The information provided in these testimonies was similar to that offered by Soldier 13 on Day 22, who stated that “Gubeh Massaquoi” gave the order to kill Koroma, which had apparently caused tension at the time, which the Witness recalled was in 2001. On Day 22, in response to Soldier 13’s insistence that the order was given in 2001, Defense Counsel noted that Johnny Paul Koroma ran for political office in Sierra Leone in 2002. 

The identity of “Angel Gabriel” was again a particular focus in questioning. Witness 48 stated that Angel Gabriel was “General Sheriff”, and in response to a Defense question asking whether Angel Gabriel’s real name was “Massaquoi or Sheriff”, the Witness answered that it was Sheriff. Witness 49 only recalled the name “Gibril Massaquoi” when prompted by the Prosecution, first offering to the Defense that Angel Gabriel’s name was “Dugbeh Washington”. 

The Defense’s third witness, Witness 52, served to support the Defense strategy of establishing an alibi for Gibril Massaquoi. Witness 52 gave wide-ranging testimony on the whereabouts of Massaquoi throughout the Second Liberian Civil War, largely anchored in the various stages of the peace process, as well as in periods of time where they lived and worked in similar areas of Monrovia or Freetown.

The Prosecution’s first three witnesses, Witness 50, Witness 51, and Witness 53, served as an attempt to establish the details of the acts charged in the indictment and to clarify Massaquoi’s participation in the acts. Witness 50 and 51 testified about an incident in Waterside where they were captured and brought to the checkpoint at the bridge, which they said took place in either 2001 or WW1.

The Defense once again highlighted apparent inconsistencies between the witnesses’ testimonies and their interviews with the Finnish police. The Witnesses explained that inconsistencies might have occurred due to the passage of time, their nervousness in interacting with the Finnish police, or deficiencies in the translation during their initial interviews. The Defense also elicited further clarification about the manner in which these witnesses came into contact with the Finnish police, focussing in particular on Witness 51’s relationship with Witness 10, who the Defense noted was also interviewed by the Finnish police. 

 The Prosecution’s final two witnesses were affiliated with the GJRP, an NGO that documents war-related crimes in Liberia. The GJRP and Civitas Maxima were involved in the initial investigation that led to the current trial. Witness 54 testified both as a victim of torture that was allegedly perpetrated by Massaquoi in 2002, and in relation to his role with the GJRP. Witness 55 was hired by the Finnish police to assist in their investigation – to help them find victims and witnesses of Massaquoi’s alleged crimes. As a result, he was mentioned by a large number of the witnesses in this trial as their contact point with the Finnish police. [Employee 1] previously worked with the GJRP as a researcher, and intended to return to work with them at some point after the investigation, but was adamant that he did not work for the GJRP while he worked with the Finnish police, and further offered that he did not investigate Massaquoi on behalf of the GJRP. 

 The Defense sought to portray these Witnesses as partisan. In particular, Defense Counsel asked whether [Employee 1]  knew the witnesses or other relevant actors prior to the investigation, and whether he offered witnesses benefits to encourage them to testify. The Defense also noted that, based on his review of the pre-trial investigation, every witness who came in contact with the Finnish police through the Witness provided the names “Gibril Massaquoi” or “Angel Gabriel”. The Witnesses denied any impropriety, highlighting his  adherence to international standards of investigation, the strict prohibition of information sharing between the GJRP and [Employee 1] while he worked with the Finnish police, and the limited role he  had in interacting with witnesses. He stated that his role was simply locating potential witnesses, and then directing them to the Court’s venue, and was not involved in taking statements.

The trial will resume in Freetown, Sierra Leone, on Tuesday, 4th of May 2021.

Exit mobile version